06 April 2008

(Lack of) Strategic Coherence in Afghanistan

You have aptly entitled today’s hearing “Strategic Chaos and Taliban Resurgence.” To a considerable degree, the absence of strategic coherence has been a powerful enabler of that resurgence.

...

The current state of affairs was not inevitable. It resulted from policy choices early on in the international community; light military and political footprints with the co-opting of local and all too frequently corrupt militia leaders rather than international boots on the ground. There was a failure to get UNSC-mandated International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) out into the provinces. In 2002, Crisis Group was arguing for a peacekeeping force of 25,000 to 30,000. Instead, there were 4,500 ISAF troops confined to Kabul.

...

Today the lack of strategic coherence within the international community effort is reflected in separate civilian special representatives of the United Nations, of the European Union and of NATO, with no clear authority one over the other; and in a reluctance on the part of the United States and other major country contributors to be coordinated by any one of them.

http://www.crisisgroup.org/home/index.cfm?id=5370&l=1

0 Comments:

Post a Comment

<< Home